Facing Forward – Co-producing 2023!

Co-production group members attending a zoom meeting

As the complexity of problems and crisis management in adult social care continues, so too do the efforts of those working across all sectors to do their bit to effect change. Change does not happen quickly or magically. There is no wand. The crisis in health pushes adult social care further down the agenda. A growing and resilient social movement for change such as #SocialCareFuture across the UK is helping to bring it back to the forefront. So too is IMPACT, an implementation centre enabling practical improvements on the ground and making a crucial contribution to longer-term cultural change. Karen, our Lived Experience Engagement Lead, shares how IMPACT’s co-production work was shaped in 2022 and the upcoming plans for co-producing in 2023.

Our co-production approach

IMPACT projects, or sites as they are known, take a co-production approach. They span many areas of adult social care, such as direct payments, decision aids in end-of-life dementia care, and technology-enabling care. Expressions of interest are now open for organisations wishing to work on change projects in partnership with IMPACT in 2023-2024.

IMPACT’s co-production advisory group ensures the voice of those with lived experience is equally represented across IMPACT’s work. As will be reflected in our first annual report when it is published.

Co-production group members attending a zoom meeting

Learning from 2022 and co-producing into 2023

Looking back, co-producing our own work plan in 2022 was challenging and sometimes frustrating, but hugely rewarding. Relationships, time, and space were key themes. Time was well spent laying the foundations of our working relationships. We also acknowledged that co-production requires more space than we often afford – or can afford it. That will be a key lesson facing our work for 2023 – more space. A safe space to keep building trust, airing opinions freely, and listening to the voices of experience. We want to improve how we communicate this experience across IMPACT teams and beyond, by engaging further with like-minded groups.

In 2023, we begin to learn about the evidence emerging from existing sites and how IMPACT is practically working. We will continue with our flexible and responsive approach to our work. Our approach will continue to adapt based on what we hear. We also aim for many of our contributions to continue being implemented across IMPACT. We will draw on the strengths of our group members to inform, guide, and ensure that those who have lived experience of drawing on social care support are central to our work.

As we scale our projects, we want to ensure that co-production remains a core approach throughout all of IMPACT’s work. We want to ensure that this is consistent and transparent. Thankfully, the IMPACT team is traveling in that same direction and is listening with open ears. And listening to hear – prepared to act upon the feedback, and committed to effecting change. Each positive change in social care, however small it may seem, can lead to another, and another. Perhaps not from a magic wand, but from these tiny ripples come great waves.

Technology and Care in 2022

We asked Esme Foxworthy-Bowers, our Facilitator in Scotland, to reflect on 2022. Esme’s Facilitator is in Glasgow, and aims to increase the use of technology in care at home services. She is reviewing and synthesising evidence to support the implementation of a new model developed by Scottish Care.

IMPACT Facilitators work within a local organisation, leading an evidence-informed change project. Through close collaboration, facilitators review the evidence, lead local change and evaluate the effectiveness of the changes that take place. In order to encourage replication across the social care sector, we will share our successful findings and outcomes with others.

What have been your highlights of 2022?

I’ve been working with Baillieston Community Care in Glasgow on technology implementation, with their care at home services. This is working alongside the Scottish Care project of ‘Care Technologists’. The role supports people to access care and helps them use technology as part of their everyday activities. To understand what has been working well or needs improvement, I’ve spoken to some of the people that the Baillieston Care Technologist has been working with. This has been one of my highlights. It has been great to be on the ground as staff and people who use the care-at-home service have learned more about technology.

Working with the Care Technologists has been another highlight for me. The team is so enthusiastic and has been doing fantastic information sharing with me! The project is allowing people who use care-at-home services and staff who provide support to identify the changes they would like to see, and to express their thoughts and opinions.

The number of opportunities for learning during this project has really impressed me. Scotland is currently working to develop a National Care Service. I’ve been in meetings where I have spoken about IMPACT’s work and the Facilitator project with individuals from the National Care Service working groups. The results will help them incorporate the practice knowledge and lived experience evidence into the development of the National Care Service. It would be incredible to see the work from this project used for such a large-scale re-design of care at home.

What have been the challenges this year?

At the beginning of my role, it was difficult to find information about previous technology projects or tests of change in the care at home sector. This prevented me from getting a grasp of what was already being done. I also needed to find out more about technology implementation. Initially, this was harder than I anticipated to navigate. A big part of my job is around evidence-based information ‘brokering’, and there isn’t a lot of information available or published at present.

How have your aspirations for the project/IMPACT changed?

I think now that the groundwork with Baillieston Community Care has been laid, my aspirations have shifted more toward plans for the Facilitator project itself. Personally, I love the information distribution aspect of this job. I want Baillieston Community Care to feel like they have more options, more knowledge, and are more enabled to explore technology in their service by the end of the pilot.

What have you learned so far?

So far, the gap between practice and research has been particularly emphasised. There is not a lot of large-scale research on technology in care at home, and services are often very stretched due to staff shortages and time.

A learning point for me was really emphasised by the equality, diversity and inclusion training that IMPACT staff attended in November 2022. This really highlighted the need for everyone in the system not to be viewed as cogs in a machine. I realised that everyone in a service has their own worries, lives, hopes and happiness to think about every day. I think this notion is consistent with the way that carers and people accessing care view technology. There is not one size that fits all and it is very individual. There is also a real worry that staff will be replaced by technology. Often this worry overshadows the potential for technology to complement care and support.

What are your hopes for next year?

I will be engaging more staff at Baillieston about IMPACT and the Facilitator project. I will also find out what kinds of technology would make a real difference. Through this, I hope I can bring an understanding of the background evidence for using technology in care at home in a way that acknowledges but takes steps to remove the fear that is sometimes present.

I am hopeful that this project can allow staff to work in ways that suit the needs of their role. They will begin to work with technology that’s suited to both them and the people accessing care. I hope the Facilitator project allows multiple organisations to understand their staff and the people that access care. Ultimately, enabling them to design ways of working that suit everyone.

What does success look like?

Success for me is ensuring that Baillieston’s hopes for this project are fulfilled. Baillieston Community Care is hoping to increase staff confidence with technology. They also want to develop case studies that can demonstrate what helps and hinders the use of technology in care at home services. This might identify the need for training in digital skills for example. By working with the Care Technologists this may encourage questions to them, which might alleviate some concerns or difficulties people face which they’re unsure about how to solve.

Conversely, it’s also becoming clear that part of success in a technological context is recognising hesitancy when using technology. Whilst there are benefits to assistive technology and information provision, digital access is about maintaining the right of people to say no to technology. Success in this context means that people benefit from technology if they choose it, and staff feels able to implement and use technology in care at home.

I think importantly, this success comes from the Facilitator contributing to evidence-based practice in this way. I am effectively distributing and encouraging the use of evidence-based practice.

What’s unique about your ‘technology in care’ project?

It’s become clear from my work so far that it is easy to assume that many social care organisations already have technology and technological skills. However, this is not necessarily the case. My hope is that confidence will increase in the future. To do this, I think we need to understand the needs, wants and fears of technology from staff and people accessing care at home.

I feel that there is a real opportunity for the Facilitator project to support this. In the future, I hope we will be able to help people in geographically different areas using technology (especially as social care provision can look very different in remote and rural areas).

Any highlights/stories/surprises you’d like to share?

A real surprise for me has been running focus groups. There have been some productive discussions about what is working and not working in terms of technology and implementation. There have also been success stories and practical knowledge sharing.

I also feel I’ve become a better ‘knowledge broker’. It has been great to experience people coming to me to ask if can share any research relating to technology implementation. This part of the Facilitator role has slotted very well into the social care setting and it feels as if I am providing a useful and relevant role. It is also great learning for the Facilitators of the future after the pilot year!

Direct Payments in 2022

card payment with IMPACT facilitator logo

We asked Marie Dunnion, our Facilitator in England, to reflect on 2022. Marie’s Facilitator takes place in Leicester and aims to identify the experiences of direct payments in black and minority ethnic communities.

IMPACT Facilitators work within a local organisation, leading an evidence-informed change project. Through close collaboration, facilitators review the evidence, lead local change and evaluate the effectiveness of the changes that take place. Successful findings and outcomes will then be shared with others for replication across the social care sector.

The Direct Payments Landscape

It feels almost unbelievable that 2022 is drawing to a close, as that means I have been an IMPACT Facilitator at Leicester City Council for almost six months! It seems a good half-way point to pause and reflect on what has been achieved in the first six months and what I wish to achieve over the remaining six months, with the project due for completion in June 2023.

I have become well-versed with the academic side of the project topic, especially as my project uniquely incorporates an academic literature review conducted by the wider IMPACT team. On the other hand, I have also been working hard to embed myself in the working life and culture of Leicester City Council, with an obvious focus on direct payments and learning about the various systems and processes in place. The Facilitator model has made it possible for me to function as a member of Leicester City Council staff, accessing the people and information necessary for me to understand the current direct payments landscape at Leicester City Council.

The Facilitator role has allowed me to explore the experiences of direct payments in Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities, which is crucially what lies at the heart of my project. The highlight of my work has been speaking to people in Leicester’s BAME communities, actively listening to their stories of how direct payments are working for them and/or how the process could be improved. One challenge I have encountered has been finding people to speak to, which reflects the difficulty that Leicester City Council has experienced in obtaining feedback on Direct Payments from BAME communities. However, from those I have spoken to, a lot of what they have said corresponds to the academic literature; for example, they enjoy the improved control and flexibility that direct payments allow them to have over their own care package. This might include hiring a Personal Assistant (PA) who is a friend or family member or selecting a PA who they feel aligns with their ethnic, cultural, and religious values.

Looking Ahead

In 2023, I hope to further explore PA recruitment, especially as Leicester City Council have just launched a PA database, which will include comprehensive information about PAs, for example what languages they speak (relating to peoples’ cultural needs). As the literature has identified a gap in knowledge from the perspective of the PA’s experience, my aspirations are extending towards speaking to PAs where possible. I have also been made aware that some people in BAME communities simply do not know about direct payments, so it would be good to know why this may be and how awareness could be raised.

Since the beginning of my project, I have felt that ‘being successful’ by the end of my time with Leicester City Council will take the form of a collective account of direct payments, comprised of experiences from lots of different BAME communities and representing various areas of adult social care. To achieve this, I will continue to listen to peoples’ stories, such as the one Hashim Duale MBE told me when speaking of the Somali community as an oral society, and sharing the advice, “Give people information in the way that they can best digest that information.” He surprised me with the concept of talking leaflets in audio format – a simple but effective alternative to written materials. This is just one example of how peoples’ stories can be used to inform new practices within Leicester City Council; I’m looking forward to seeing how this and other evidence is implemented over time.

Decision aids and Dementia in Wales

two individuals on a beach looking out to the sea. IMPACT facilitator logo on top of the image.

We asked Leanne Taylor, our Facilitator in Wales, to reflect on 2022. Leanne’s Facilitator is in Ebbw Vale, Wales, and aims to introduce a decision-aid tool about support for family carers of people with dementia at end of life.

IMPACT Facilitators work within a local organisation, leading an evidence-informed change project. Through close collaboration, facilitators review the evidence, lead local change and evaluate the effectiveness of the changes that take place. Successful findings and outcomes will then be shared with others for replication across the social care sector.

What have been your highlights of 2022?

The developing relationship with the CARIAD (Care And Respect In Advanced Dementia) service within Hospice of the Valleys and the wider hospice has been a clear highlight for me. The rapport with the CARIAD service has been easy to form and they have been super welcoming of my role and my presence. It has been easy to ‘slot’ into the team and be treated like a fellow team member who is included in routine internal meetings and updates. They have always been willing to find dedicated time to discuss the project I am introducing to their service and the surrounding evidence base.

From the outset, it was clear to me that they wanted to be accommodating and supportive of the role. Cariad’s initial curiosity about the facilitator role and its purpose was encouraging and led to many insightful, unplanned, and in-depth ‘corridor’ discussions where I was able to gain deep learning about their aims, purpose, practice, challenges, and underlying values. My growing insight in this regard has allowed me to present my work and ideas in thoughtful and sensitive ways that are considerate of the service and its surrounding context.

What have been the challenges this year?

Untangling the knowledge exchange role has been important to understand what it means in the hospice setting and its value. On paper, it reads easily as “supporting the hospice and staff in their practice of carers of people living with dementia, nearing the end of life”. However, working in a setting where staff have a plethora of knowledge and past practice experience that guides their everyday practice, has meant I’ve been privy to a collective work ethic that is person-centered, bespoke, and dynamic, where practice and decisions occur “on your feet”. It’s therefore been a challenge to master the introduction of new and different knowledge in this context; doing so has meant encouraging a pressured and relatively small staff team to make time to reflect, think and plan new ways of working.

We are working with a specific decision aid too and in addition to scoping out how the tool would sit in other parts of the hospice, I, with the support of the CARIAD staff, am looking at how the tool can be used, presented, and re-framed to complement the service’s strong identity.

How have your aspirations for the project/IMPACT changed?

I am not sure that they have changed. When I started the role, I was excited about bringing lived experience, practice knowledge and research and evidence into closer contact and more explicit communion, and I am still very passionate about how the Facilitator model can support this process. If anything has changed for me, it has been about how I operationalise the project. Initially, I wanted to gain insight by encountering and supporting a range of staff members, carers, dialogues, and stories. However, the real-world pressures that carers and staff members experience mean that opportunities to reflect, analyse and participate in purposeful collective learning are thin. This means that I have needed to look for depth rather than quantity, where I capitalise on the rich and deep lessons present in the small number of case studies and discussions that my work is supporting, and where I can think about how these lessons can interact with my background research and reading to be made meaningful for the hospice and IMPACT.

What have you learned so far?

I have gained insight into the dementia and care setting in Wales, its strategic priorities and ways of working. I have also learnt about dementia, the challenges that carers confront, and the many national activities and interventions that are taking place to support these groups and tackle their challenges.

In terms of my practice, I have had to learn about and work with real-time experimentation and learning. I have needed to deal with the feeling of working with a model as it develops which is exciting but a little scary!

What are your hopes for next year?

From my perspective, it would be great for the staff teams and individuals I am working with to engage with the experience of trialing new evidence in practice. I am looking forward to seeing what comes of the process; the creativity that can be revealed and harnessed when reflecting on real-time learning and practice. I also hope that these experiences encourage ongoing curiosity and learning within the hospice, long after my tenure.

What does success look like?

My idea of success mirrors that of the hospice. While every voice in this knowledge-sharing process matters, the voices of those with lived experience need to be heard loudly and clearly, and in this case, that is the voice of carers. The Welsh Facilitator project will be successful if carers and staff feel that their needs, ideas, and challenges, have been engaged with, understood, and addressed as a result of this process.

What’s unique about your decision aids project?

This project and subject matter are unique because it is addressing end of life planning and care for people with dementia, which has not been considered extensively enough in Welsh and national policy. According to Hospice UK and others, generalist social care services tend to designate end-of-life planning and conversations to “specialist” palliative services, while really, this is a conversation that everyone should be engaging in. The piloting of an evidenced tool that is intended to support carers who are supporting people nearing the end of their lives, and talking about the tool with external, non-specialist services, is perhaps going someway to normalising end-of-life conversations.

Asset-based approaches in 2022

Magnifying glass and a man writing in a piece of paper - showing different asset-based approaches

We asked Robin Miller, IMPACT Demonstrators Lead, and Sarah McLoughlin, our Strategic Improvement Coach, to reflect on 2022 and the Demonstrator project so far. Our Demonstrator is taking place in Northern Ireland, and is looking at ‘asset-based approaches’, and how older people can have a better life via health and social services working in new ways with them, the community, and the voluntary sector.

What have been your wins/highlights of 2022?

The potential value that can be generated through IMPACT partnering with an innovative local area to learn from their experiences and support them to build on their strengths. Mid & East Antrim has been a great place for the Demonstrator model to be piloted due to MEAAP’s established networks with older people and with policy and practice partners. Our World Café stakeholder event was an excellent reflection of this – 50 people with lived experience and/or professionals coming together to discuss, debate and design.

How have your aspirations for the project/IMPACT changed?

The overall aspirations for the project – understanding how to engage all of the relevant stakeholders in a local area with innovation, identifying what the important elements of an asset-based approach in primary and social care – remain the same. Through the gathering of lived, practice and research evidence the opportunities to support improvement have become clearer though, for example in relation to responding to the different expectations of diverse communities and demonstrating to professionals how the approach can save them time as well as benefit older people and their families.

What have you learned so far?

When planning future Demonstrators, it will be important that there is a good level of commitment from across the social and health care system, and a local organisation who is well connected and willing to lead on the process in this area.

There are relatively few people with all the knowledge and skills necessary to undertake a strategic improvement role in social care – therefore part of the role of IMPACT needs to be on workforce development and building a cadre of people with these skills.

What are your hopes for next year?

Apart from the very practical hope that our second Improvement Coach is appointed, we want to take forward the actions that are set out in the theory of change regarding increasing the spread and further strengthening the depth of this asset-based approach. We would also hope for policy makers in Northern Ireland to learn from our experience in Mid and East Antrim as they develop the integrated care system.

What’s unique about your ‘asset-based approaches’ project?

The strength of connection with older people in the local area, the high level of commitment from stakeholders, and the capacity building activities with the voluntary and community sector.

Any highlights, stories, or surprises you’d like to share?

The World Café event we ran in November, and feedback from older people and wider stakeholders is a great example of the project’s impact to date.

Find out more about the Demonstrator project.

Relationships and meetings of the mind

IMPACT and The Health Foundation logos

Earlier this year, IMPACT’s Co-production Advisory Group had the pleasure of meeting and engaging with The Health Foundation Inclusion Panel. This created an opportunity for IMPACT to focus on building relationships between organisations. Early in the process we agreed this would be a two-way engagement and we would focus on the theme of co-production. The detail of what that would look like took a little longer to decide.

Co-producing an event

We agreed to co-produce the preparation and delivery of our co-production themed event, involving two members of each group plus the coordinator of each group. Narrowing down such a big topic is challenging – it can be time consuming and a little messy, but this is time well spent. As co-production means different things to different people, it involves accommodation and relationship building, seeing things from alternative perspectives and not being prescriptive. Not being prescriptive means that it can take time to tease out the theme and agree on questions to address and perhaps working in a way that’s different from what we are used to.

Happy to say I’m quite reassured it’s come a long way. I didn’t think you would get there, well done guys!  Testament to real coproduction in action.

Isaac Samuels, member of the Co-production Advisory Group

Building relationships for a successful approach

Cohesiveness, trust, and building relationships takes time for groups. This applies internally to groups and in external engagement. This is an ongoing challenge when time to co-produce, plan and deliver is limited or restricted by the reality of projects and work programmes.

A takeaway for me was the importance of building relationships to ensure effective co-production.

Ann Marie Penman, member of the Co-production Advisory Group

As a fledgling group meeting, engaging, sharing and learning with an established group was insightful. We are at different points in our journeys – we are starting out on our journey and the Health Foundation Inclusion Panel is working out its path for a sustainable and productive future. The experience of meeting a more established group reinforced the point that relationships, group trust and dynamic takes time to build. The sense of family and community from the well-established Health Foundation Inclusion Panel was palpable. This was inspiring and settled us as a group that we are right to spend time on building relationships and trust within our group.

In the practical sense, the process of co-producing the joint event has prompted us to try this approach in our preparation and meeting delivery. Until this point, we were somewhat self-critical of our own approach – a ‘knowing’ that we weren’t quite there but not quite sure how to get where we want to be.

Reflections

I am very proud of our work as the Co-production Advisory Group in 2022, particularly our ability and willingness as a group to be flexible, listen to each other, to feedback and most importantly to act upon it. Building relationships involves building trust and confidence. This takes time. A key takeaway from this meeting is co-producing the preparation, delivery and follow up. We are implementing this approach in our workplan for 2023.

Karen McCormick, Lived Experience Engagement Lead 

My own reflections were about how important it is to consider the whole process in effective co-production. That is, thinking about before, during and after i.e. how do we make sure we give the opportunity of involvement to everyone, how do we bring people together in a suitable space (physical and otherwise) and how are people kept involved and updated afterwards? A lot of our discussions focused on the being together part, but I think it’s important not to lose site of the ‘before’ and ‘after’.

Ann Marie Penman, member of the Co-production Advisory Group 

Relationship building extends beyond the relationship between two groups. Bringing in another group can somewhat shift the dynamic within our own groups. Sharing lived experiences and a passion for co-production with another group was empowering for members of IMPACT’s Co-production Advisory Group, a sense of shared purpose, a healthy respect and acknowledgement of the perspective of others.

Reflections on Co-production

Zoom screenshot of Co-production Advisory Group meeting

We asked members of the Co-production Advisory Group, to reflect on the year, and the work of the group so far. Scroll through to read reflections from Karen McCormick (Lived Experience Engagement Lead), and Ann Marie Penman who co-designed and co-facilitated the last Co-production Advisory Group meeting of 2022.

Karen McCormick’s Reflections

Our Co-production Advisory Group has been given the freedom this year to co-design and co-develop our way of working (Charter), our workplan and how we will meet strategic objectives. This approach has been a breath of fresh air. However, it is not without challenge. There is a fine line between coordinating, supporting, and delivering for the group and the project but in a way that is not prescriptive.

We created a reflections document, which collates the sentiments, thoughts, and ideas of group members. Starting from “you said”, we move towards the outcomes we want to achieve and some actions that we can either take as a group or put forward to other team members in IMPACT that may be helpful in delivering the outcomes.

We have a number of priorities for 2023, including: establishing and embedding two-way communications with and across IMPACT, continuing to identify the skills and assets of the group and expand our engagement offering, and establishing a feedback loop.

Thoughts from Ann Marie Penman

It seems to me that we’ve come a really long way. We’ve come together from across four nations, with different backgrounds, experiences, skills, and opinions but with a shared belief in the value of co-production to make things better.

It’s been a really steep learning curve, in terms of getting to know each other, the wider work of IMPACT and what our role is and might be.

Our remit is very broad, but there are three key aspects:

  • develop, support, monitor and review IMPACT’s co-production activity
  • produce an annual report
  • identify areas of good practice and areas for development

In our first year, it feels like we’ve had an inward focus, quite rightly looking at us as a group and what we bring, our strengths and our assets. As well as that, we’ve been exploring and gathering more information on the wider work of IMPACT.

Each time we’ve met, we have raised questions, made observations, picked up issues and contributed comments – and it’s all of these that have been gathered together into our reflections document. Essentially, it’s giving us a direction for our second year. It’s clear in these recommendations that it’s still important that we continue getting to know each other better but there’s also now an increased emphasis on our personal development, for each one of us. What is the benefit for any one of us in being part of this group?

And there is a clearer balance now in terms of what we want to be bringing to the wider work of IMPACT – what difference do we make, what value do we add and how are things better because of us, the Co-production Advisory Group?

The reflections document is our own development plan. It’s what we’ve come up with ourselves in terms of what is important for us but also recommendations for the IMPACT Leadership Team, for all the different IMPACT projects and the whole organisation.

I think it’s important to remember this is a living document. It will grow and develop each time we meet as we go through the next year. We can add to it, change it and further develop it but also what we want to do is think about, for each recommendation, what is the outcome that we want to put forward as the Co-Production Advisory Group, what will be better and specifically what is the benefit and for who?

Working with the NIHR Delivery Research Programme

A paper setting out a framework for collaboration between NIHR Health and Social Care Delivery Research (HSDR) and IMPACT was discussed at the HSDR Programme Oversight Committee in April 2022. The principles for closer working to promote and enhance social care research were welcomed by the HSDR Programme Director and committee. The Committee endorsed the approach, setting out how this informal collaboration might work and key touchpoints where there would be mutual benefit in close working to maximise HSDR outputs and reach wider social care audiences. This was seen as an exciting opportunity for the Programme.

It was agreed that information on current studies in the pipeline could be shared regularly with Jon Glasby and staff at IMPACT, perhaps on a quarterly basis. It was suggested that pilot work would be done with early engagement with teams and projects on linked studies on family group conferencing and support for people with learning disabilities/autism leaving long-stay hospitals which are likely to be of great interest to social care practitioners and service users. 

Jon Glasby is also linked into other parts of NIHR, including the School for Social Care Research, Research for Social Care programme and the NIHR Centre for Engagement and Dissemination. Developing ways of working with HSDR programme may be a useful pilot arrangement which could be the model for other parts of NIHR.

This paper was then discussed at the IMPACT Leadership Team meeting in June 2022.  With a few minor changes in wording or emphasis, IMPACT would be keen to pursue all the opportunities below as a way of supporting NIHR as it extends its social care expertise and presence, and as a way of supporting a number of IMPACT’s key objectives.

Frameworks for working with NIHR

Background

IMPACT is the UK centre funded by the ESRC and Health Foundation to implement evidence in adult social care.  Following a scoping phase with surveys and Assemblies to identify pressing topics and ways of working, the new centre will enter a steady state for five years from 2023-27. After this, the aspiration is that the centre, or key elements of its work, becomes a more permanent feature of the social care landscape (future business model tbc).

NIHR Health and Social Care Delivery Research (HSDR) Programme is a national funding programme awarding more than £20m a year for research on the quality and organisation of services in health and social care. Projects relevant to social care range from evidence synthesis on strengths-based approaches to social work to ambitious evaluations of family group conferences for vulnerable adults. 

Suggested areas for joint working and synergy

  • Anticipating research pipeline and maximising funded outputs

HSDR has a number of projects underway in the area of adult social care. This includes £7m+ investment in local adult social care research partnerships around the country, projects on self-neglect, care workforce and support for older carers. In the first instance, this could be a pilot for one or two research teams and projects to work with IMPACT, with IMPACT delivery staff working to implement findings from these studies. This would need to depend on their being an appropriate ‘fit’ between forthcoming research and IMPACT’s priorities for 2023-25 (to be submitted to IMPACT’s funders in September 2022). NIHR studies would also need to be working with a similar definition of evidence (which IMPACT defines in terms of insights from different types of research, the lived experience of people drawing on care and support and carers, and the practice knowledge of social care staff).

  • Identifying gaps/research needs

IMPACT’s broad and deep engagement will help to identify priority areas for future research. This is already evident from outputs from the survey/Assemblies which highlighted the importance of research in areas like prevention and wellbeing, asset-based approaches, carers’ health and wellbeing, and support for people who work in social care. Having chosen a series of key topics for its forthcoming work programme, IMPACT also goes through a ‘triage’ process to make sure that there is enough evidence with which to work, and checking for gaps – in either research, lived experience or practice knowledge. HSDR could work with IMPACT and constituent partners to work up briefs in priority areas, identifying important areas of research interest and important gaps in knowledge and framing calls in ways that will resonate with social care researchers and communities. 

  • Building capacity and sharing expertise

Consider opportunities to develop and strengthen capacity and community in adult social care research. Some approaches for embedded research and capacity building are being tested in the new HSDR adult social care partnership research awards, as well as particular opportunities through NIHR Academy Incubator for Social Care. There may be other opportunities – for instance, shadowing or sharing resources around review and research methods through the rapid evaluation and synthesis centres. This is a key priority for IMPACT as one of its four objectives is around building capacity in the workforce, and there may be scope to explore for IMPACT to support the local stakeholders with whom it is working on the ground to encourage stronger applications for existing NIHR capacity building schemes and helping to create a pipeline of credible candidates for these opportunities.

HSDR would also benefit from the expertise and networks of IMPACT to strengthen funding committee and reviewer base to make the right decisions with the right expertise for new projects.

Next steps

  • IMPACT and HSDR Programme staff to meet to take forward above areas for development – with quarterly meetings suggested going forwards
  • There is a particular opportunity to build in 1-2 topics from current NIHR projects into the draft work programme which IMPACT submits to funders in September 2022
  • IMPACT and HSDR to explore scope to publish a statement about this relationship/ways of working

Equality, Diversity & Inclusion

It has been a busy few months for IMPACT with all of our projects up and running, and the team travelling from across the four nations to Birmingham, to meet for an Equality, Diversity and Inclusion training day, facilitated by Clenton Farquharson and Luke Geoghegan from our Leadership Team.

Amongst all of the busy, hard work, there has also been good news across IMPACT we’d like to share.

Clenton Farquharson, our Leadership Team lived experience lead, has been named as one of the 50 most influential Black, Asian and minority ethnic people in health, by the Health Service Journal.

IMPACTAgewell, who are hosting our Demonstrator project, won the Best Health Creating Population Health Management Approach award, at the UK Excellence in Health Creation Awards.

IMPACT’s Director, Jon Glasby, joined the Scottish Parliamentary Committee on Health, Social Care and Sport to provide evidence on the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill. You can watch the session back here.

Subscribe to our newsletter to be amongst the first to hear of news and updates.

+ More